The Punjab and Haryana High Court has permitted the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to question six additional witnesses in a case involving Justice Nirmal Yadav, a former High Court Judge. Justice Nirmal Yadav...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court made it clear that an appeal under GST law cannot be rejected by the Appellate Authority just because the required fee was not fully paid. This situation arose...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court raised concerns about the Haryana government’s choice to allow liquor sales after midnight in Gurugram and Faridabad. This issue came up from a petition that challenged a part...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a case against a man accused of making and selling clothes with a fake Puma label. The court decided that there is no copyright protection for the...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court confirmed the Waqf Tribunal’s ruling, emphasizing that land marked as Takia (for communal Muslim use), graveyard, or mosque in official records must be safeguarded, regardless of whether it...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court noted that Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, applies to arbitration cases started before the 2015 Amendment Act. This was highlighted in a petition by...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court confirmed an Arbitral Award related to a land dispute and emphasized that the Court’s authority under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is limited, while...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has emphasized that the Railway Administration is strictly liable for incidents, meaning they cannot claim that the victim was negligent. The Court accepted an appeal that contested the...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has stated that noise pollution is a serious offense under The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. This means that police must file a First Information...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court decided that courts cannot accept partial agreements in criminal cases. This means some accused can’t be cleared while others still go to trial. The ruling followed a question...
